Transfer Petition Vs Section 24 CPC: Supreme Court Or High Court — Where Should You File?

Transfer Petition Vs Section 24 CPC Filing Guide 2026

A practical guide to choosing the correct forum for case transfer under section 24 CPC, section 25 CPC and Supreme Court Transfer Jurisdiction

NEW DELHI: Many litigants get confused between a Transfer Petition before the Supreme Court and a Transfer Application under Section 24 CPC before the High Court or District Court.

This confusion becomes common in matrimonial disputes, civil suits, custody matters, maintenance proceedings, property disputes and other connected litigation where one party wants the case to be shifted from one court to another.

The basic difference is simple:

  • If the case has to be transferred within the same State or within the same High Court’s territorial jurisdiction, the remedy is generally under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
  • If the case has to be transferred from one State to another State, the remedy is generally before the Supreme Court under Section 25 CPC.

Therefore, the first question is not whether transfer is possible. The first question is: which court has the power to transfer the case?

What Is A Transfer Petition?

A transfer petition is a legal request made before a superior court to shift a pending case from one court to another.

The purpose of transfer is not personal convenience alone. Courts examine whether transfer is necessary for:

  • Fair trial
  • Proper adjudication
  • Convenience of parties and witnesses
  • Avoiding conflicting decisions
  • Consolidation of connected proceedings
  • Ends of justice

In matrimonial cases, transfer petitions are commonly filed when husband and wife are litigating in different cities or States. One party may seek transfer on the ground of distance, financial hardship, health condition, child-care responsibility, threat perception, or multiple connected cases pending at one place.

However, transfer is not automatic. The court has to balance the hardship of both sides.

Section 24 CPC: Transfer Power Of High Court And District Court

Section 24 CPC gives power to the High Court and the District Court to transfer or withdraw any suit, appeal or other proceeding pending before a subordinate court.

This power may be exercised:

  • On the application of a party
  • After notice and hearing
  • By the court on its own motion
  • At any stage of the proceedings

Section 24 CPC is generally used where the transfer is sought within the same State or within courts subordinate to the same High Court or District Court.

The object of Section 24 CPC is to ensure that the case is heard by a proper court and that justice is not defeated due to inconvenience, prejudice, multiplicity of proceedings, or procedural hardship.

Use of Section 24 CPC

  • It applies to civil suits, appeals and other civil proceedings.
  • It can be invoked before the High Court or District Court.
  • It is generally used for intra-State transfer.
  • The court can transfer the case or withdraw it to itself.
  • The court may act on an application or suo motu.
  • The main consideration is proper administration of justice.

Section 25 CPC: Transfer Power Of Supreme Court

Section 25 CPC gives power to the Supreme Court of India to transfer any suit, appeal or other proceeding from a High Court or civil court in one State to a High Court or civil court in another State.

This is the key distinction.

When the transfer is inter-State, the High Court generally cannot transfer the case from one State to another. Such transfer falls within the Supreme Court’s jurisdiction under Section 25 CPC.

The Supreme Court may order transfer if it is satisfied that transfer is expedient for the ends of justice. The application must be supported by an affidavit.

For example, if a matrimonial case is pending in Delhi and transfer is sought to Mumbai, the appropriate remedy would generally be a transfer petition before the Supreme Court under Section 25 CPC.

Applicability of Section 25 CPC

  • It applies to civil suits, appeals and other proceedings.
  • It is filed before the Supreme Court.
  • It is used for transfer from one State to another State.
  • The application must be supported by an affidavit.
  • The Supreme Court must be satisfied that transfer is necessary for the ends of justice.
  • It is commonly used in inter-State matrimonial transfer petitions.

Section 24 CPC vs Section 25 CPC: Main Difference

The main difference between both provisions is the forum and territorial scope.

Section 24 CPC is invoked before the High Court or District Court for transfer within their jurisdiction. Section 25 CPC is invoked before the Supreme Court when transfer is sought from one State to another.

In simple words:

  • Same State / same High Court jurisdiction: Section 24 CPC
  • One State to another State: Section 25 CPC before Supreme Court

This distinction is very important because filing before the wrong forum can result in delay, dismissal, or unnecessary litigation cost.

Where Should You File?

The correct forum depends on where the case is pending and where transfer is sought.

File Under Section 24 CPC When:

  • The case is pending in one court and transfer is sought to another court within the same State.
  • The case is pending before a subordinate court and transfer is sought within the same High Court’s jurisdiction.
  • A family court matter is to be transferred from one family court to another within the same State.
  • A civil suit, appeal or proceeding is to be shifted for convenience, fairness or proper adjudication within the same jurisdiction.

File Before Supreme Court Under Section 25 CPC When:

  • The case is pending in one State and transfer is sought to another State.
  • A matrimonial case is pending in Delhi and transfer is sought to Mumbai.
  • A civil proceeding is pending in Uttar Pradesh and transfer is sought to Rajasthan.
  • The transfer involves two different High Court jurisdictions in different States.

Important Laws On Transfer Of Cases

The Code of Civil Procedure contains multiple provisions dealing with transfer of civil proceedings.

Section 22 CPC: Section 22 CPC deals with transfer where a suit may be instituted in more than one court. If a suit could have been filed in multiple courts, the defendant may apply for transfer to another competent court.

Section 23 CPC: Section 23 CPC explains where an application under Section 22 CPC has to be filed. It identifies the correct appellate court, High Court or competent court depending on the hierarchy of courts involved.

Section 24 CPC: Section 24 CPC gives general transfer and withdrawal power to the High Court and District Court. This is the most commonly used provision for transfer of civil proceedings within the same State or jurisdiction.

Section 25 CPC: Section 25 CPC gives power to the Supreme Court to transfer civil cases from one State to another State. It is used when the case crosses State boundaries.

Article 139A Of The Constitution Of India: Article 139A deals with transfer of certain cases involving the same or substantially same questions of law pending before the Supreme Court and one or more High Courts, or before two or more High Courts.

Criminal Transfer Provisions: For criminal cases, the transfer power is separate and cannot be mixed with CPC transfer provisions. Criminal case transfer is governed by criminal procedure provisions such as Section 406 CrPC or the corresponding provision under BNSS.

Case Laws On Transfer Petitions

Sumita Singh v. Kumar Sanjay, (2001) 10 SCC 41

In this case, the Supreme Court considered the difficulty faced by the wife in travelling to contest matrimonial proceedings and allowed transfer.

This judgment is often relied upon in matrimonial transfer petitions to argue that the wife’s convenience is a relevant factor while deciding transfer.

However, this does not mean that every transfer petition filed by the wife must automatically be allowed. The judgment has to be understood in the facts of the case.

Anindita Das v. Srijit Das, (2006) 9 SCC 197

This is an important balancing judgment.

The Supreme Court cautioned that transfer petitions should not be allowed mechanically merely because the wife has sought transfer. The Court observed that each case must be decided on its own facts.

The Court also noted that in appropriate cases, instead of transferring the case, the court may direct payment of travel and stay expenses so that the party can contest the case without undue hardship.

This case is important from the husband’s side because it shows that transfer cannot become an automatic rule.

N.C.V. Aishwarya v. A.S. Saravana Karthik Sha

In this case, the Supreme Court discussed factors that may be considered in matrimonial transfer petitions, including economic condition, social circumstances, convenience of parties and the overall facts of the case.

The judgment is relevant because it shows that matrimonial transfer petitions are decided on practical realities and not only on technical objections.

Kulwinder Kaur v. Kandi Friends Education Trust

This judgment is often cited for general principles governing transfer under Section 24 CPC.

The power of transfer has to be exercised judicially and not casually. Courts may consider fairness, convenience of parties and witnesses, nature of proceedings, avoidance of conflicting judgments, and the larger ends of justice.

Transfer In Matrimonial Cases

Matrimonial transfer petitions are one of the most common categories of transfer litigation.

In many cases, the wife seeks transfer of the husband’s divorce petition, restitution petition, custody matter or other matrimonial proceeding to the place where she is residing.

The grounds usually taken are lack of independent income, responsibility of minor child, distance, health condition, safety concerns or inability to travel alone.

But the husband can also oppose transfer.

A husband opposing transfer should not merely say that the wife is misusing the process. He must place proper facts and documents before the court.

He may show his employment constraints, financial condition, aged parents, medical issues, pending connected cases, child visitation difficulty, travel cost, or how transfer will cause greater hardship to him.

The correct legal argument is not that the wife’s convenience is irrelevant. The correct argument is that both sides’ hardship must be balanced and transfer should not become punishment before trial.

Common Grounds Taken By Wife

  • She has no independent income.
  • She has custody of a minor child.
  • She cannot travel long distance.
  • She has health issues.
  • She has safety concerns.
  • Multiple connected cases are pending at her place of residence.
  • She depends on her parents or family for support.

Common Grounds Taken By Husband To Oppose Transfer

  • He has employment restrictions.
  • He has aged or dependent parents.
  • He has financial hardship.
  • He has medical issues.
  • The transfer will disturb child visitation.
  • The transfer petition is filed only to harass him.
  • Connected proceedings are already pending at the existing place.
  • He is willing to bear reasonable travel expenses instead of transfer.

Factors Courts Consider Before Transfer

Courts usually examine several practical factors before allowing or rejecting a transfer petition.

These include:

  • Distance between the existing court and proposed court
  • Financial position of both parties
  • Health condition of the parties
  • Age and dependency of family members
  • Responsibility of minor children
  • Safety concerns
  • Availability and convenience of witnesses
  • Pendency of connected proceedings
  • Possibility of conflicting judgments
  • Whether the transfer petition is bona fide
  • Whether the petition is filed to harass the opposite party
  • Balance of hardship between both sides

In matrimonial cases, the responsibility of a minor child is often considered relevant. At the same time, the court may also look at whether the transfer petition is genuine or whether it has been filed only to harass the opposite party.

A party seeking transfer must show real hardship. A party opposing transfer must show why the existing forum is proper and why transfer would cause prejudice or unnecessary burden.

Documents That May Support A Transfer Petition

A transfer petition should not be based on bare allegations. Relevant documents may include:

  • Medical documents
  • Proof of residence
  • Child’s school records
  • Income documents
  • Travel distance details
  • Copies of connected cases
  • Threat complaints, if any
  • Employment documents
  • Dependency documents
  • Previous court orders

Documents help the court understand whether the hardship is real or merely alleged.

Common Mistakes Litigants Make

One common mistake is filing the transfer petition before the wrong court.

If the transfer is within the same State, parties sometimes rush to the Supreme Court unnecessarily. If the transfer is from one State to another, parties sometimes file before the High Court even though the High Court may not have such power.

Another common mistake is relying only on emotional grounds without documents. Courts decide transfer petitions on facts, not sympathy alone.

Mistakes To Avoid

  • Filing before the wrong forum
  • Not checking whether transfer is intra-State or inter-State
  • Making vague allegations without documents
  • Ignoring connected proceedings
  • Not explaining hardship clearly
  • Not filing proper affidavit where required
  • Using transfer petition only as a pressure tactic
  • Assuming that wife’s convenience or husband’s hardship will be accepted automatically
  • Not giving practical alternatives such as video conferencing or travel expenses 

CONCLUSION

The difference between a Supreme Court transfer petition and Section 24 CPC is mainly based on jurisdiction.

For transfer within the same State or within the same High Court’s jurisdiction, Section 24 CPC is generally the remedy before the High Court or District Court.

For transfer from one State to another State, Section 25 CPC before the Supreme Court is generally the remedy.

In every transfer case, the court looks at convenience, fairness, hardship, prejudice, connected proceedings, and the ends of justice.

A transfer petition should not be filed casually. It must be supported by facts, documents and a clear legal basis.

FAQs

  • When should I file a transfer application under Section 24 CPC?
    You should generally file under Section 24 CPC when the case has to be transferred within the same State or within the same High Court’s jurisdiction.
  • When should I file a transfer petition before the Supreme Court?
    You should generally approach the Supreme Court under Section 25 CPC when the case has to be transferred from one State to another State.
  • Can the High Court transfer a case from one State to another?
    Generally, no. Inter-State transfer of civil cases is usually within the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court under Section 25 CPC.
  • Is wife’s convenience enough to transfer a matrimonial case?
    Wife’s convenience is a relevant factor, but it is not an automatic rule. Courts also consider husband’s hardship, financial condition, employment, child-related issues, connected cases and overall balance of convenience.
  • Can a husband oppose a transfer petition?
    Yes. A husband can oppose it by showing genuine hardship, such as employment difficulty, financial burden, aged parents, health issues, child visitation problems, connected proceedings or mala fide intent behind the transfer petition.

 

Read Also  Compulsory Pre-Litigation Mediation for Commercial Suits: A Balanced Approach to Efficient Dispute Resolution
Scroll to Top